![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||
|
The evolution of bacterial diseases Obscured behind current media focus on the Human Genome Project, there is considerable activity in sequencing bacterial genomes. There are presently more than 30 published eubacterial genome sequences (data from TIGR). Comparison of the sequences is leading to new insights into how bacteria have acquired new genes which allow them to take advantage of developing ecological niches. Bacteria are responsible for causing a number of serious human diseases. Many of these diseases depend on high human population density for their success. However, humans are not naturally herd animals and therefore it seems likely that the pathogens have "taken advantage" of the development of civilisation as an opportunity to adopt a new host. What is the evidence for this and is evolution of new diseases still occurring?
DNA sequences can provide evidence for evolutionary routes in several ways. Chromosomal DNA accumulates mutations at a predictable rate as a result of errors in replication and environmental mutagens, which are not corrected by DNA repair systems. Comparing sections of DNA in related species or strains allows deductions to be made on the length of time since they diverged from a common ancestor. Choice of sequence to apply this "molecular clock" is important. Mutations which change amino acid sequence at important positions in key proteins are likely to be lethal and hence are selected against; comparison of such sequences will probably give underestimates of evolutionary time. In Escherichia coli a synonymous site (where no amino acid change is caused by a base-changing mutation) is estimated to mutate once in approximately 1010 years. Sequence comparison has also revealed that bacteria carry sections of DNA which seem to have come from other species in the evolutionarily recent past. This suggests that there is a significant level of "gene sharing" between bacterial species; this is called horizontal gene transfer. A crucial example is that pathogens carry blocks of genes which code for proteins involved in pathogenicity within their chromosomes. Sequence analysis suggests that in some cases these "pathogenicity islands" have been transferred from other species. Thus it is possible for a harmless bacterium to acquire the genes necessary to make it a pathogen in one step, by conjugational transfer of a plasmid or transfer by bacteriophage.
The similarity of tested chromosomal sequence between Y. pst and Y. ptb makes accurate dating uncertain, however the authors conclude that divergence occurred recently (1500 - 20 000 years ago). Although this is is a wide range, the most recent date ties up with the first recorded pandemic of plague (Justinian's plague) between 541-767 AD; suggesting that Y. pst appeared just prior to this. So what is the difference between these genetically almost identical bacterial species that leads to their vastly different pathogenicities? Although Y. ptb is a gastrointestinal pathogen, it can cause fatal septicemia in stressed animals, and can be transmitted to fleas. However, injection of the bacterium into the blood of a new host is unlikely because of lack of retention in the flea gut, and probable low dissemination in the host after injection during biting. Acquisition of two plasmids removed these barriers.
The second pandemic occurring in the middle ages in Europe was caused by a different strain of Y. pestis and most of the present day disease is caused by a third strain. A recent paper (8) reported PCR and sequence analysis of Y. pst DNA fragments from teeth from a 14th century mass grave in France, adding to evidence that bubonic plague was prevalent during this period. The three strains appear to have originated in different parts of the world as determined by differences in genome composition. Studies such as this, which attempt to piece together the genetic events which led to the development of diseases are relevant to current concerns about the appearance of new and unsuspected epidemics against which we have little protection. An example is Escherichia coli strain O157. This differs from more familia,r less harmful, strains in causing severe diarrhea and possibly death. The complete genomes of two non-pathogenic strains of E. coli have been sequenced (5). Now the O157 sequence is being analysed and compared with the other E. coli sequences. So far the comparison has revealed the gene for shiga toxin from the diarrhea-causing bacterium Shigella (on a bacteriophage) (7), virulence genes carried on plasmids and a pathogenicity island. There is also evidence for a higher than normal mutation rate due to defective repair of mismatches in sequence between DNA strands. Such defects also make it more likely that foreign DNA will be incorporated into the chromosome. This potential for accelerated genomic change could increase the rate of acquisition of pathogenic characteristics. The emergence of this strain as a health issue may be an example of exploitation of the bacterium of a new niche; the mass preparation of food. Comparison of partial and complete genome sequences can identify the genes which determine pathogenicity, and the origin and means of acquisition of the genes. This knowledge can then be used in developing effective defences against old and new diseases. 1. Achtman M et al (1999) Yersinia pestis, the cause of
plague, is a recently emerged clone of Yersinia pseudotuberculosis.
Proc. Natl. Acad Sci. USA 96,
14043. see also: BioBeat online
magazine feature on ref. 7
|
|
Web Links Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA Virtual Library of Microbiology and Virology
Site Links
|
Pathogenic bacteria carry genes coding for a range of proteins which are involved in their transfer between hosts and interaction with the host. The protein functions can be divided into three major groups: adhesion of bacterium to host cells; invasion of host; defence from host protective mechanisms The specific protein actions depend on the host and mode of infection. Transcription of pathogenicity genes, leading to virulence factor protein synthesis, is turned on by environmental conditions associated with the host through specialised regulatory pathways. Pathogens may also use a signalling process to determine population density (³quorum sensing²) before expressing virulence factors. (2) back to text
Pathogenicity islands are sections of a bacterial pathogen genome which contain clusters of genes required for virulence. . Sequencing has revealed their presence in a number of pathogens, as well as similarities across species boundaries. The islands are absent from related non-pathogens. DNA sequence in pathogenicity islands often has a different base content and different codon usage to that in the rest of the chromosome. This suggests that they originated from other species by horizontal genetic transfer. They are probably transmissable as transposable elements. An example is the LEE island found in enteropathogenic strains of E. coli. This 35kbp section of DNA carries genes coding for an outer membrane protein required for adhesion to the host cell, and proteins required for secretion of proteins which influence host cell activities (3) back to text
Mismatch repair is a DNA repair mechanism which has been observed in a wide range of organisms. In bacteria, integration of foreign DNA into the chromosome occurs by a process called recombination which involves exchange of similar sequence DNA. Loss of mismatch repair mechanisms makes it much more likely that alien DNA which does not have a close sequence match will be incorporated into the chromosome. back to text
Please cite http://www.bioupdates.co.uk/togo.htm if using this material
site design by BioUpdateS
Molecular graphics exported from RasMol
updated 04/01